![]() ![]() I ask at the door that says “criminal” and the woman there said, no, this is for the serious criminals. So I don’t know where to go in the huge marble lobby. When you are reading this I am waiting for a jury trial. ![]() The first event was the court date of December 30, 2019. ![]() The State’s Attorney said what the police did is fine. I have written email and letters and sent the video to newspapers, TV stations, State officials, the Justice Department, the FBI, the Police and the State’s Attorney. On December 17 when this happened I had my own recording going, but no audio. Malicious prosecution in an attempt to avoid a suit against the City of Torrington for police misconduct. Stalling for two years in hopes I will plead guilty to something.Ĭourt date Octowith seven motions pending mostly for Discovery. Motion denied in writing but not delivered until two months after it was denied. The prosecutor claims no appearance was filed while the judge said it was filed two months earlier in open court. The court record is available on request.įifteen court dates in two years, motions unread, continuances granted to the prosecution. A motion for Discovery denied because the evidence was “not relevant” but did not say why it was not relevant despite clear arguments of relevance in court. A motion for change in venue was denied by a single word. Requests for information from the Torrington Board of Public Safety were ignored.įive motions filed over a year ago are unread in the Torrington Courthouse. Multiple FOI requests are still waiting for hearings in Hartford after nearly two years. I have the names of the office claiming to send it and the officer claiming Torrington never received it. Torrington police claim they never received the request for investigation. State police were asked to investigate but claimed no jurisdiction, that they would forward the request to Torrington police. I was offered a $35 fine to plead guilty. Some evidence was destroyed after I requested it On the record in open court. She admits to it so as not influence a future jury. State Prosecutor Sarah Fallon asked Corporation Counsel Victor Muschell to direct police not to comply with my requests for evidence via the Freedom of Information Act. Police handcuffed and bloodied me while not under arrest, clearly told multiple times on video I was “detained” not under arrest.Īfter police saw blood on my face while I was handcuffed I was charged with resisting arrest. So here are some of my simpler claims so far: Malicious prosecution in Connecticut is more difficult to prove. Section 242 of Title 18 of US Criminal Code. I believe it is a crime to prosecute me so that I won’t sue them for misconduct, called, Depravations of Rights Under Color of Law. I recently contacted the US Department of Justice and the State of Connecticut Attorney General. I call this Prosecutorial, Judicial and Procedural misconduct. If I am found guilty of anything at all my chances for winning a suit are diminished. The ONLY reason for prosecution is if I sue the City of Torrington. I know in the video Quarles says I am not under arrest, but he called the supervisor who told me in the car I was under arrest. I will not plead guilty to resisting arrest. WATCH THIS VIDEO Click the link to the LEFT. It you have not yet watched the video of my arrest, WATCH IT NOW. This was last updated 18 months ago, but the final days of my criminal charges are soon over. I blame his training and the culture of violence in the Torrington Police. I spent several hours with him that morning in the ambulance, the TPD and at the Emergency Room at Charlotte Hungerford. Twenty Two Months Ago today I was arrested and bloodied by Torrington Police officer William Quarles. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |